Independent register of AI agents & harnesses · no sponsored placementsEdition 2026-09 · 107 entries · evidence to 26 Sept 2026

The Register / Coding agents / Zed (Agent Panel)

Register entry · Coding agents · updated 26 Sept 2026

Zed (Agent Panel)

Zed is a Rust code editor whose Agent Panel runs a built-in coding agent that reads, edits and runs commands in a project, with per-tool permissions and an OS-level sandbox on by default since v1.14. Through the Agent Client Protocol (ACP) it also hosts external agents such as Claude Agent, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode and Cursor. Since April 2026 it can run several agent threads in parallel, each optionally on its own Git worktree. The editor is GPL-3.0 open source; hosted models require a Zed account, while bring-your-own-key and external agents are free.

What reviewers and users praise

  • Can run and switch between several agents (built-in and ACP external agents) in one editor window
  • Parallel agent threads with worktree isolation are praised by users moving from single-thread agent workflows
  • Fast, lightweight editor that users keep even when they run agents elsewhere
  • Free bring-your-own-key use and external agents on the $0 plan

What they criticise

  • Agent UI and parallel-agent layout described as confusing by several users after the April 2026 changes
  • Built-in agent seen by some reviewers and users as less capable or less turnkey than Cursor, Claude Code or OpenCode
  • ACP-hosted external agents reported as buggy or limited (buffer not refreshing, lost LSP access, never-ending runs)
  • Diff/code-review tooling for reviewing agent output considered insufficient by some users
Rating certificate · AW/26-09/04426 Sept 2026

Zed (Agent Panel)

Zed Industries · Coding agents

No. 3 of 16 in categoryhigh confidenceTrust AOpen source
Adoption93
Experts73
Crowd46
Experts vs the crowdcrowd cooler by 27
Experts73
Crowd46
PriceFree, paid from $10
Use it viaDesktop app
Runs onmacos, linux, windows
LicenceGPL-3.0-or-later
UpdatedEvidence collected 26 Sept 2026

How the rating was worked out

Weights for Coding agents: adoption 35%, experts 40%, crowd 25%. Pillars without enough evidence are left out and the others re-weighted. The method.

Adoption & momentumweight 35%93GitHub stars 91k → 90 · 46 releases in 90 days → 100
reach × 0.7 + momentum × 0.3
Expertsindependent reviews · weight 40%738 independent reviews (5 positive · 3 mixed · 0 negative), averaged toward 50 for small samples.
Crowdcommunity sample · weight 25%4629 dated posts from reddit, hackernews, github: 10 positive · 6 mixed · 13 negative
(positive + ½ mixed) ÷ n, averaged toward 50 for small samples
Rating73high confidence (3 of 3 pillars, 29 community posts).

Evidence checks. 1 item removed: date does not match the source (1). 1 post over the three-per-thread limit not counted. How evidence is checked.

Editorial adjustment. Incident-history re-grade under methodology revision 2 (see the trust section).

Trust & safety

Seven dimensions graded A–D from documented facts. Overall: A.

A

Permission model

Terminal and fetch tools run in an OS-enforced sandbox enabled by default for all users from v1.14 (Aug 2026); default rules forbid writes outside project directories, writes to .git and network requests, with per-request escalation prompts. Separate tool-permission rules (always_allow / always_confirm / always_deny) are documented. Windows sandboxing only for WSL shells. source

A

Data access scope

Sandbox scopes agent writes to project directories; tool permissions match on file paths and commands (e.g. deny .env); Threads Sidebar lets users choose which folders/repos each thread can access, with optional per-thread worktrees. source

A

Data storage

Editor and agent run locally; BYOK keys stored in the system keychain; Zed states it does not store prompts regardless of plan unless the user shares or opts in. Hosted-model requests pass through Zed to providers. source

A

Data retention & training

No training on prompts or code by default; provider agreements require zero data retention for Zed-hosted inference except Anthropic covered models (retained at least 30 days for trust and safety). Opt-in only for feedback/edit-prediction data. source

C

Incident history (24 months)

12 GitHub security advisories published Aug 2025-May 2026, 11 rated high or critical, several in the agent itself (agent RCE, symlink escape in agent file tools, terminal-permission allowlist bypasses). All list patched versions and were publicly disclosed. Regraded from D: Revision 2: serious issues that were each fixed and publicly disclosed grade C; D is kept for unresolved issues or slow or undisclosed fixes. source

B

Compliance

Zed's SOC2 page states it is working toward SOC 2 Type 1; the Zed for Business post (May 2026) says SOC 2 certification is in progress. No attestation published. source

A

Transparency

Editor and agent crates are GPL-3.0-or-later on GitHub; public stable and preview release notes. source

The experts

8 named independent reviews found; dated reviews from the last 12 months are scored.

  • mixed
    Yes, Zed is ready for serious daily use, but it’s not the most turnkey option.Matt Abrams (Builder.io blog) · 22 Jan 2026 · builder.io
  • positive
    builtin agent harness is basic but nice with the ability to follow the agent around as it modifies filesE.G. Jones (braw.dev) · 6 Apr 2026 · braw.dev
  • positive
    the first major code editor to make multi-agent orchestration a first-class primitive rather than something you cobble together.Developers Digest · 22 Apr 2026 · developersdigest.tech
  • mixed
    If your workflow leans heavily on AI-generated code (not just completions, but whole-feature drafting), the performance trade-off flips against you.Kunal Ganglani (kunalganglani.com) · 11 Jul 2026 · kunalganglani.com
  • mixed
    So my overall opinion on Zed is I like it. I wanted to like it more because I do really appreciate how fastYour Average Tech Bro (YouTube) · 25 Feb 2026 · youtube.com
  • positive
    For the longest time, nothing ticked every box, until I discovered Zed. Honestly, I was impressed.Jan Marshal (YouTube) · 21 Dec 2025 · youtube.com
  • positive
    So that's really nice and I have found the AI stuff to be good.Scott Tolinski (Syntax, YouTube) · 17 Dec 2025 · youtube.com
  • positive
    So, the point isn't look how much AI it has. The point is it helps and then it gets out of its way.Better Stack (YouTube) · 4 Feb 2026 · youtube.com

The crowd

29 coded posts from reddit, hackernews, github.

10 positive6 mixed13 negative
  • negative
    Zed AI doesn’t feel as good as vscode copilot or opencode with the same model.r/ZedEditor · 15 Dec 2025 · reddit.com
  • negative
    However the AI agent panel on the right is completely opposite of this and needs plenty of improvements to really be on-par with rest of the components in Zed.r/ZedEditor · 4 Feb 2026 · reddit.com
  • negative
    I found the Zed quite handy in the beginning. But meanwhile I stopped using it. It went fairly complex without bringing the value of the externals.r/ZedEditor · 8 Mar 2026 · reddit.com
  • positive
    it was the key tool to 'get it' (coming from Cursor) when going from single threaded agentic dev to parallel agentic dev.HN: Parallel agents in Zed · 23 Apr 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • negative
    Zed’s agent ui is the most confusing ui I have ever seen.HN: Parallel agents in Zed · 23 Apr 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • negative
    I gave zed agent another shot today, and it couldn't run bash commands, so back to opencode I go.HN: Parallel agents in Zed · 23 Apr 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • positive
    This update gives me everything I need to finally leave Cursor & VS Code behind! I'm loving it!r/ZedEditor (Parallel Agents launch thread) · 23 Apr 2026 · reddit.com
  • mixed
    the agent-centric direction is right, but I quickly went back to Codex (the Mac app, not the CLI).r/ZedEditor (Parallel Agents launch thread) · 23 Apr 2026 · reddit.com

Pricing

As published, checked 26 Sept 2026.

PlanPriceNotes
PersonalFree2,000 accepted edit predictions; unlimited use with your own API keys or external agents
Pro$10 / monthlyUnlimited edit predictions, $5 of tokens included, usage-based billing beyond $5; 14-day free trial
Business$30 / monthlyPer seat; org-wide AI model policies, data governance controls, RBAC, unified spend visibility

Recent changes

Ranked alongside

Other ranked entries in Coding agents.

Compare with the top two
OpenCodeAnomaly75
Claude CodeAnthropic73
GitHub CopilotGitHub (Microsoft)72
Grok BuildSpaceXAI (formerly xAI)68

Sources

Every figure above traces to one of these, observed up to 26 Sept 2026.

  1. GitHub API repo metadata (stars 90,900; license NOASSERTION at repo level, crates GPL-3.0-or-later)
  2. Zed docs: Agent Panel
  3. Zed docs: External Agents / ACP Registry
  4. Introducing Zed for Business (SOC 2 in progress)
  5. The Register: Zed team releases version 1.0 (news, not used as a review)
  6. HN Algolia API, comments on 'Parallel agents in Zed' (source of HN items)
  7. PullPush Reddit archive API (source of Reddit items; reddit.com blocked direct and Bright Data fetches)
  8. researcher-A Terminal-Bench 2.0 and SWE-bench snapshots: no Zed entry
  9. HN Algolia comment search used for sampling
  10. Transcript source for YouTube review excerpts (same pattern for lRrElGM23h4, kCWwrx51IS4, u4UL0p9t3a0)