Independent register of AI agents & harnesses · no sponsored placementsEdition 2026-09 · 107 entries · evidence to 26 Sept 2026

The Register / Business & sales agents / Harvey

Register entry · Business & sales agents · updated 26 Sept 2026

Harvey

Harvey is a legal AI platform used by large law firms and corporate legal departments for research, drafting, contract and document review, and multi-step agent workflows. It runs frontier models from several providers and integrates with Word, Outlook, SharePoint and legal content providers. Harvey II (August 2026) added Memory, Spaces and matter-aware agents. The company raised $550M at a $15.5B valuation in September 2026; pricing is not published.

What reviewers and users praise

  • Microsoft 365 integrations and document grounding (Reddit in-house user; Lawyerist)
  • Fast pace of agent features (Artificial Lawyer on Harvey II)

What they criticise

  • High price relative to general-purpose LLMs (Reddit r/legaltech; Claude for Lawyers)
  • Several practitioners report output quality that still needs heavy review (Reddit r/biglaw, HN)
Rating certificate · AW/26-09/39726 Sept 2026

Harvey

Harvey (Counsel AI Corporation) · Business & sales agents

No. 2 of 2 in categorymedium confidenceTrust A
Adoption43
Experts58
Crowd41
Experts vs the crowdcrowd cooler by 17
Experts58
Crowd41
PriceCustom
Use it viaWeb app, Desktop app, Mobile app, API
Runs onweb, windows, macos
Licenceproprietary
UpdatedEvidence collected 26 Sept 2026

How the rating was worked out

Weights for Business & sales agents: adoption 25%, experts 40%, crowd 35%. Pillars without enough evidence are left out and the others re-weighted. The method.

Adoption & momentumweight 25%43Reported users 100k → 27 · 11 releases in 90 days → 80
reach × 0.7 + momentum × 0.3
Expertsindependent reviews · weight 40%583 independent reviews (1 positive · 2 mixed · 0 negative), averaged toward 50 for small samples.
Crowdcommunity sample · weight 35%4111 dated posts from reddit, hackernews: 3 positive · 2 mixed · 6 negative
(positive + ½ mixed) ÷ n, averaged toward 50 for small samples
Rating48medium confidence (3 of 3 pillars, 11 community posts).

Evidence checks. 1 post over the three-per-thread limit not counted. How evidence is checked.

Trust & safety

Seven dimensions graded A–D from documented facts. Overall: A.

n/e

Permission model

No documentation found on approval modes or sandboxing for agent actions.

A

Data access scope

Syncs and enforces firm ethical-wall policies, role-based access controls and logical workspace separation; customers choose what data to upload. source

B

Data storage

Cloud-hosted on Microsoft Azure with EU/Switzerland, US or Australia processing; customers can delete data at any time. No self-hosting. source

A

Data retention & training

No training on inputs, outputs or uploaded documents; requires Zero Data Retention from model providers; customers set retention periods. source

A

Incident history (24 months)

No security incidents or CVEs found in a web search (Sep 2026).

A

Compliance

SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 (renewed), plus ISO 27701 and ISO 42001 listed; reports available in trust center. source

B

Transparency

Closed source; monthly public product roundups ('The Brief') and frequent dated product posts; public help centre. source

The experts

3 named independent reviews found; dated reviews from the last 12 months are scored.

  • positive
    Overall a strategy that makes a lot of sense.Richard Tromans, Artificial Lawyer · 18 Aug 2026 · artificiallawyer.com
  • mixed
    LAB is the most ambitious public attempt yet to measure what legal AI agents can actually do on the kind of work law firms actually delegate.Bob Ambrogi, LawSites · 19 May 2026 · lawnext.com
  • mixed
    Harvey is a genuinely impressive enterprise legal AI platform — fast, secure, and trusted by a huge share of the world's largest firms.Claude for Lawyers · 9 Sept 2026 · claudeforlawyers.com

The crowd

11 coded posts from reddit, hackernews.

3 positive2 mixed6 negative
  • negative
    Harvey appears to be a heavily overpriced (a) pretty UI; (b) prompt library; and (d) RAG toolr/legaltech · 18 Nov 2025 · reddit.com
  • positive
    We use it in our in-house legal department (3 attorneys, 2 paralegals, risk manager, legal ops manager) and really like it.r/legaltech · 18 Nov 2025 · reddit.com
  • negative
    Because it's a phantom product pretending to be something it's it not.r/legaltech · 18 Nov 2025 · reddit.com
  • mixed
    It's the best of the big ai law tools. It's worse than non ai law tools in most instances.r/legaltech · 31 Jan 2026 · reddit.com
  • mixed
    I think it saves me 3-5 hours a week - obviously varies from week to week. And I think any substantial time saving is worth paying for.r/legaltech · 31 Jan 2026 · reddit.com
  • positive
    it seems like it can do a pretty good job at transactional matters and faster too.r/biglaw · 13 Mar 2026 · reddit.com
  • negative
    I’ve been trying to incorporate Harvey as a litigator for the last year and am unimpressed most times I ask it to do anything of substance.r/biglaw · 13 Mar 2026 · reddit.com
  • negative
    As an associate: HARVEY IS SHIT.r/biglaw · 13 Mar 2026 · reddit.com

Pricing

As published, checked 26 Sept 2026.

PlanPriceNotes
EnterpriseCustomNo public pricing. Harvey's COO described seat-based pricing with a consumption option (Legal IT Insider, Sep 2026). A Reddit user cited about $1,000/seat/month as a single-licence rack rate (unverified).

Recent changes

Ranked alongside

Other ranked entries in Business & sales agents.

Compare with the top two
ClayClay Labs61

Sources

Every figure above traces to one of these, observed up to 26 Sept 2026.

  1. The Brief: July 2026 (published 2026-07-17)
  2. The Brief: August 2026 (published 2026-08-13)
  3. Releasebot aggregation of Harvey product posts (2026-08-18 to 2026-09-23)
  4. Harvey security page