Independent register of AI agents & harnesses · no sponsored placementsEdition 2026-09 · 107 entries · evidence to 26 Sept 2026

The Register / Personal & desktop agents / OpenClaw

Register entry · Personal & desktop agents · updated 26 Sept 2026

OpenClaw

OpenClaw runs a local Gateway on the user's machine or server and exposes an LLM agent through chat apps such as WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, iMessage and Signal, plus a browser Control UI. The agent can read and write files, run shell commands, browse, call APIs and run scheduled tasks, and is extended through skills and plugins (including the ClawHub registry). It is MIT-licensed, stewarded by the OpenClaw Foundation, and version 2.0 (v2026.8.1, 30 Aug 2026) added shared cloud sessions and a rebuilt web UI. It has had a large number of published security advisories and a malicious-skills supply-chain campaign in 2026.

What reviewers and users praise

  • Broad reach into everyday tools; users report automating real business workflows (HN, Reddit)
  • Large, fast-moving open-source project with hundreds of contributors per release
  • Highly customisable: multiple agents, per-project threads, local or hosted models

What they criticise

  • Security exposure: repeated advisories, a 2026 malicious-skill campaign, and a trusted-operator default with sandboxing off
  • Upgrades frequently break installs; users report hours of repair work after 2.0 and 2026.7.x updates
  • Setup and maintenance are demanding for non-technical users
  • Newer safety limits removed capabilities some users relied on
Rating certificate · AW/26-09/22226 Sept 2026

OpenClaw

OpenClaw Foundation (created by Peter Steinberger) · Personal & desktop agents

No. 2 of 3 in categoryhigh confidenceTrust BOpen source
Adoption98
Experts59
Crowd37
Experts vs the crowdcrowd cooler by 22
Experts59
Crowd37
PriceFree
Use it viaCLI, Desktop app, Web app, Mobile app, Chat apps
Runs onmacos, linux, windows
LicenceMIT
UpdatedEvidence collected 26 Sept 2026

How the rating was worked out

Weights for Personal & desktop agents: adoption 30%, experts 35%, crowd 35%. Pillars without enough evidence are left out and the others re-weighted. The method.

Adoption & momentumweight 30%98GitHub stars 391k → 100 · npm weekly downloads 2.8M → 93 · 31 releases in 90 days → 100
reach × 0.7 + momentum × 0.3
Expertsindependent reviews · weight 35%598 independent reviews (3 positive · 4 mixed · 1 negative), averaged toward 50 for small samples.
Crowdcommunity sample · weight 35%3725 dated posts from reddit, hackernews, x: 6 positive · 5 mixed · 14 negative
(positive + ½ mixed) ÷ n, averaged toward 50 for small samples
Rating63high confidence (3 of 3 pillars, 25 community posts).

Evidence checks. 4 items could not be checked at the source (the page could not be fetched, or the quote is from a comment under the linked post); kept and marked “unverified”. How evidence is checked.

Editorial adjustment. Incident-history re-grade under methodology revision 2 (see the trust section).

Trust & safety

Seven dimensions graded A–D from documented facts. Overall: B.

C

Permission model

Exec approvals docs: an unconfigured node uses the same `full` / `off` (security full, ask off) baseline as the Gateway, i.e. trusted-operator auto-execution. Tool sandboxing (Docker/Podman/OpenShell) is opt-in via a documented 'minimal enable example'; an independent review notes sandboxing is off by default. source

B

Data access scope

Default trusted-operator model gives the agent broad host access; docs describe group allowlists, mention gating, root-bounded file operations and per-agent sandbox workspaceAccess settings. source

A

Data storage

Self-hosted; 'On a regular host install the Gateway binds to loopback.' State lives in ~/.openclaw on the host. Shared cloud sessions (2.0) are optional. source

n/e

Data retention & training

No vendor-hosted data store for the self-hosted product; retention/training depends on the model provider the user connects. No documented retention or no-training statement found for the optional cloud sessions. source

C

Incident history (24 months)

Repeated serious issues: CVE-2026-25253 one-click token exfiltration (CVSS 8.8, Feb 2026); ClawHavoc malicious-skill campaign on ClawHub (341+ skills, AMOS stealer); 722 published GitHub security advisories Jan–Sep 2026 including 14 critical (e.g. sandbox escape, node RCE via approval bypass), with 75 more published in Sep 2026. Fixes are released, but the pattern is ongoing. Regraded from D: Revision 2: serious issues that were each fixed and publicly disclosed grade C; D is kept for unresolved issues or slow or undisclosed fixes. source

D

Compliance

No SOC 2 / ISO 27001 attestation found; community open-source project run by a non-profit foundation. source

A

Transparency

MIT licence (Copyright OpenClaw Foundation); public GitHub releases and per-version release notes on docs.openclaw.ai; public security advisories. source

The experts

8 named independent reviews found; dated reviews from the last 12 months are scored.

  • mixed
    Given the inherent risk of prompt injection against this class of software it’s my current pick for most likely to result in a Challenger disasterSimon Willison (simonwillison.net) · 30 Jan 2026 · simonwillison.net
  • positive
    It's leagues better than any other 'agent' experience I've triedDan Cleary (PromptHub newsletter) · 17 Feb 2026 · danjcleary.substack.com
  • mixed
    Sandboxing is off by default, and the Gateway plus native plugins remain outside it.Omid Saffari · 8 Aug 2026 · omidsaffari.com
  • positive
    OpenClaw 2.0 is a meaningful usability leap for one of the most capable open personal-agent systemsThe Rundown AI · 31 Aug 2026 · therundown.ai
  • negative
    Is OpenClaw ready for mainstream UX work? The honest answer is not yet. The friction is too high.Yuval Keshtcher (UX Writing Hub) · 30 Jan 2026 · uxwritinghub.com
  • mixed
    Right now, OpenClaw feels built by developers, for developers. The power is there—honestly, it’s so good.Wyndo (The AI Maker newsletter) · 5 Feb 2026 · aimaker.substack.com
  • mixed
    The gap between "this technically works" and "I trust this with my actual data" is still too wide for me.Likhit Kumar V P (DEV) · 8 Feb 2026 · dev.to
  • positive
    So. Would I recommend OpenClaw? Yes. But with conditions.Radek Sienkiewicz (VelvetShark) · 26 Feb 2026 · velvetshark.com

The crowd

25 coded posts from reddit, hackernews, x.

6 positive5 mixed14 negative
  • positive
    Hey everyone, I love OpenClaw. It’s probably my favorite piece of software I’ve ever used.r/openclaw · 24 Sept 2026 · reddit.com
  • negative
    I just had to nuke and start my openclaw install fresh after none of the AIs could walk me through fixing it.r/openclaw · 22 Sept 2026 · reddit.com
  • negative
    Now, if i send credentials, my agent keeps saying that he is not allowed to save them in a file or even use them to login!r/openclaw · 20 Sept 2026 · reddit.com
  • positive
    Openclaw works better for my use case. It lets me use telegram "threads" for each separate projectr/openclaw · 20 Sept 2026 · unverified · reddit.com
  • mixed
    If I could start all over again, I would start with Hermes. It's much more reliable.r/openclaw · 20 Sept 2026 · unverified · reddit.com
  • negative
    Don't do it folks. Just wait. Torched my 2026.7.x install.r/openclaw · 31 Aug 2026 · unverified · reddit.com
  • negative
    The frustrating part is that I’ve had to dedicate one agent solely to OpenClaw maintenance because of recent issuesr/openclaw · 16 Aug 2026 · unverified · reddit.com
  • mixed
    I think openclaw is useful, loop, memory, agents, integrations, but after a week a testing, honestly I don't need it much.r/LocalLLaMA · 22 Feb 2026 · reddit.com

Pricing

As published, checked 26 Sept 2026.

PlanPriceNotes
Open source (self-hosted)FreeHomepage states: "No subscription. No hosted tier. No token." Users pay for model access, hardware and any connected services.

Recent changes

Ranked alongside

Other ranked entries in Personal & desktop agents.

Compare with the top two
Hermes AgentNous Research69
ZeroClawZeroClaw Labs61

Sources

Every figure above traces to one of these, observed up to 26 Sept 2026.

  1. OpenClaw — Wikipedia (timeline, foundation, 2.0 release)
  2. TechCrunch: OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger joins OpenAI
  3. CNBC: From Clawdbot to Moltbot to OpenClaw
  4. Simon Willison: OpenClaw name history (Warelay → CLAWDIS → Clawdbot → Moltbot → OpenClaw)
  5. OpenClaw docs: Sandboxing
  6. r/openclaw 'Is OpenClaw Dead?' (foundation staff reply cites npm growth from ~176k/day to ~422k/day)