Independent register of AI agents & harnesses · no sponsored placementsEdition 2026-09 · 107 entries · evidence to 26 Sept 2026

Compare / Superset vs Paperclip

Superset vs Paperclip

Superset rates 70 against Paperclip's 58 in this edition. The table lines up every dimension we record; the leading value in each numeric row is marked. Add a third or fourth entry.

Dimension
SupersetSuperset Inc.
PaperclipPaperclip (paperclipai)
Rating
AgentsWisdom score7058
Confidencehighhigh
Rank in categoryNo. 2 of 7No. 6 of 7
Pillars
Adoption & momentum7669
Experts (independent reviews)7256
Crowd (community sample)6046
Community posts sampled1821
Experts vs crowdCrowd cooler by 12Crowd cooler by 9
Adoption
GitHub stars15k85k
npm weekly downloadsn/e27k
PyPI monthly downloadsn/en/e
VS Code installsn/en/e
Reported usersn/en/e
Reported customer organisationsn/en/e
Releases, last 90 days2910
Benchmarks (shown, not scored)
Terminal-Bench 2.0not listednot listed
SWE-benchnot listednot listed
Independent reviews66
Trust & safety
Overall gradeAB
Permission modelBC
Data access scopeBB
Data storageAA
Data retention & trainingn/en/e
Incident historyAC
ComplianceAD
TransparencyBA
Price
PriceFree, paid from $20Free
Plans
  • Free: Free
  • Pro: $20 / monthly
  • Enterprise: Custom
  • Open source, self-hosted: Free
Product
CategoryOrchestrators & meta-harnessesOrchestrators & meta-harnesses
MakerSuperset Inc.Paperclip (paperclipai)
LicenceElastic-2.0MIT
Use it viaDesktop app, CLI, MCP server, API, Mobile appWeb app, CLI, API
Runs onmacos, linuxmacos, linux, windows, web
Models it drivesClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor Agent, Gemini CLI, any terminal-based coding agentClaude (via Claude Code), GPT (via Codex), Gemini (via Gemini CLI), Cursor, any agent reachable by CLI or HTTP heartbeat
Key features
  • One git worktree, branch, terminal set and port range per workspace
  • Runs any CLI coding agent unmodified in a persistent terminal (sessions survive app restarts via a background daemon)
  • Built-in diff viewer, PR review and CI check view
  • In-app browser pane with per-workspace port detection and a Design mode for UI edits
  • Agent status sidebar with notifications when an agent needs attention
  • Scheduled automations, CLI, TypeScript SDK and MCP server
  • Remote access to workspaces on other machines and an iPhone app (Pro)
  • Org chart of agents with roles, reporting lines and per-agent permissions
  • Ticket-based task system with atomic checkout and goal ancestry
  • Scheduled heartbeats and routines (cron, webhook, API triggers)
  • Per-agent/project budgets with hard stops and cost tracking
  • Board approval gates for hires, strategy and spend; audit log
  • Adapters for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor/Gemini CLI, bash and HTTP bots (e.g. OpenClaw)
  • Multi-company isolation in one deployment; export/import of company templates
  • Isolated execution workspaces via git worktrees
Verdicts
Praised for
  • Terminal-first design lets users run the real Claude Code/Codex CLIs with their latest features, which reviewers contrasted with Conductor's custom chat UI
  • Supports many agents rather than one or two vendors
  • Persistent terminals that survive app updates or closing were singled out by users
  • Structured hierarchy, handoffs and task tracking for many agents (Villela, Reddit users)
  • Useful for bootstrapping larger projects and drafts quickly (Ganglani, Villela)
  • Free, MIT-licensed and self-hosted
Criticised for
  • Some users reported terminal rendering glitches and freezes
  • Reviewers and users found the PR/workspace flow less polished than Conductor and the UI growing 'bloated'
  • Linear and some team features are gated behind the $20/user/month Pro plan; sign-in to the vendor cloud is required for the hosted build
  • No Windows build; Linux build is experimental
  • Heavy token consumption; users report subscription windows exhausted quickly (Reddit, Better Stack video)
  • Marketing of 'zero-human companies' overstates what it can do (Ganglani, r/AI_Agents)
  • Setup and adapter bugs; runaway retries hard to stop (r/PaperclipAI, HN)
  • Repeated critical security advisories in 2026, and adapters skip agent permission prompts by default
Evidence
Evidence collected26 Sept 202626 Sept 2026
Sources cited54