Independent register of AI agents & harnesses · no sponsored placementsEdition 2026-09 · 107 entries · evidence to 26 Sept 2026

The Register / Coding agents / Junie

Register entry · Coding agents · updated 26 Sept 2026

Junie

Junie is a coding agent from JetBrains that plans, edits code, runs commands and tests, and reviews pull requests. It runs as a plugin in JetBrains IDEs and Android Studio, as a standalone CLI (which can also act as an ACP server), and in GitHub Actions and GitLab pipelines. It left beta on 17 June 2026. Usage is paid with JetBrains AI credits, with your own API keys, or with local models, including a free on-device mode (Junie Local) announced in August 2026.

What reviewers and users praise

  • Model choice: users like switching between Google, OpenAI and Anthropic models, or using BYOK and local models (HN, Reddit, Éderson Fernandes)
  • Tight integration with JetBrains IDEs for developers already on that toolchain (Mike Lundahl, AltAI, HN)
  • Some users report low monthly cost when paired with cheaper models such as Gemini Flash (HN)
  • Mid-table Terminal-Bench 2.0 result (rank 18 of 43 harnesses)

What they criticise

  • Credit-based pricing: many users say credits run out quickly and top-ups add up (Reddit, HN, AltAI)
  • Seen by many users as less capable or less polished than Claude Code or Codex (Reddit, HN)
  • Reported as slower than competing agents (Mike Lundahl, AltAI)
  • Local-model setup reported as unreliable by some users; confusion over how Junie, AI Assistant and Air relate (Reddit, HN)
Rating certificate · AW/26-09/56426 Sept 2026

Junie

JetBrains · Coding agents

No. 15 of 16 in categoryhigh confidenceTrust B
Adoption37
Experts78
Crowd44
Experts vs the crowdcrowd cooler by 34
Experts78
Crowd44
PriceFree, paid from $8.33
Use it viaCLI, IDE extension, Web app
Runs onmacos, linux, windows
Licenceproprietary
UpdatedEvidence collected 26 Sept 2026

How the rating was worked out

Weights for Coding agents: adoption 35%, experts 40%, crowd 25%. Pillars without enough evidence are left out and the others re-weighted. The method.

Adoption & momentumweight 35%37GitHub stars 460 → 20 · npm weekly downloads 633 → 0 · 32 releases in 90 days → 100
reach × 0.7 + momentum × 0.3
Expertsindependent reviews · weight 40%786 independent reviews (5 positive · 1 mixed · 0 negative), averaged toward 50 for small samples.
Benchmarks, shown not scored: Terminal-Bench 2.0 No. 18 of 43 (Junie CLI (JetBrains) + Multiple models)
Crowdcommunity sample · weight 25%4418 dated posts from hackernews, reddit: 5 positive · 5 mixed · 8 negative
(positive + ½ mixed) ÷ n, averaged toward 50 for small samples
Rating55high confidence (3 of 3 pillars, 18 community posts).

Evidence checks. 1 review from tool directories, AI-written pages or unnamed authors not counted. 2 posts over the three-per-thread limit not counted. 1 item could not be checked at the source (the page could not be fetched, or the quote is from a comment under the linked post); kept and marked “unverified”. How evidence is checked.

Editorial adjustment. Not independent: the author received free Junie access from JetBrains, as disclosed in the post (gapfill-1).

Trust & safety

Seven dimensions graded A–D from documented facts. Overall: B.

B

Permission model

Brave mode has three documented levels (Off asks approval for every potentially sensitive action outside the allowlist; Auto approves commands judged safe; On approves everything), plus a per-user Action Allowlist. The CLI sandbox (writes limited to project/git/temp/tool caches, ~/.ssh reads blocked) is off by default, macOS/Linux only, and documented as available in development, nightly and experimental builds. source

A

Data access scope

Junie respects a project .aiignore file and asks for explicit approval before viewing or editing listed files; command allowlist is documented; opt-in sandbox limits writes to project directories. YouTrack has user reports of .aiignore regressions (LLM-23365, LLM-27523). source

A

Data storage

Agent runs locally in the IDE or terminal; can be used with BYOK providers or local models, and Junie Local runs fully on-device with no account. Default JetBrains AI credit usage routes prompts through JetBrains' cloud to model providers; AI Service Terms say data may be stored for a limited period for security monitoring. source

C

Data retention & training

JetBrains AI Service Terms (v2.1): JetBrains and its AI subcontractors will not use inputs/outputs to train language models. Separately, detailed code-related data (full LLM inputs/outputs) may be used to train JetBrains' own models with a 1-year retention; it is opt-in for commercial and organisational licences, but for non-commercial individual licences sharing is on by default with an opt-out (Product Data Collection notice v1.6; The Register, Oct 2025). Graded C for the opt-out cohort; commercial users alone would be B. source

C

Incident history (24 months)

Three Junie CVEs in NVD within 24 months, all fixed in named versions: one medium information disclosure and two command/code-execution issues rated up to 9.8 CRITICAL. Graded C (serious CVEs, resolved); a strict reading of 'repeated' could give D. source

A

Compliance

JetBrains holds a SOC 2 Type II report (new 2024/25 report published 20 Nov 2025, available via the Trust Center); not ISO 27001 certified. Junie homepage states SOC 2 certification. source

B

Transparency

Closed source: the GitHub repo distributes binaries under '© JetBrains s.r.o. All rights reserved' and the JetBrains AI Service terms. Detailed public docs and a dated What's New changelog. source

The experts

6 named independent reviews found; dated reviews from the last 12 months are scored.

  • positive
    For me, Junie has been great and I use it every day.Mike Lundahl (mikelundahl.com) · 11 Dec 2025 · mikelundahl.com
  • positive
    If you're a developer looking for an AI coding agent that's flexible, integrable, and doesn't lock you into a single ecosystem, Junie CLI deserves your attention.Éderson Fernandes (blog.edersonfernandes.com.br) · 23 Apr 2026 · blog.edersonfernandes.com.br
  • positive
    In conclusion, Junie proves to be an exceptional tool for conducting code reviews.Miguel Teheran (DEV Community) · 21 Oct 2025 · dev.to
  • positive
    Junie rarely surprises me — and that’s high praise.Alessandro Giacomella (Medium) · 21 Nov 2025 · unverified · medium.com
  • positive
    It didn't just chat—it read my file structure, summarized my UI architecture, and even proposed a "Quick Win" refactor for my Home Screen.Somasundaram Mahesh (YouTube) · 27 Nov 2025 · youtube.com
  • mixed
    the credit system burns through your monthly quota in days once Junie gets involvedJovan Chan (AICoderScope, republished on DEV Community) · 1 Jun 2026 · dev.to

The crowd

18 coded posts from hackernews, reddit.

5 positive5 mixed8 negative
  • positive
    Junie is good. Needs a few UI tweaks, but the code it generates is state of the art.HN: Google Antigravity · 19 Nov 2025 · news.ycombinator.com
  • positive
    I really enjoy Junie, I find it working better out of the box than Claude code.HN: Claude Code gets native LSP support · 22 Dec 2025 · news.ycombinator.com
  • negative
    Mainly, they're pushing Junie and it just isn't that good or compelling, when faced off against the competition.HN: Show HN: Sweep, open-weights 1.5B model · 22 Jan 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • negative
    it also has frequent agent crashes (bye tokens) and sometimes is unreachableHN: Anthropic Claude Max $200/mo thread · 4 Feb 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • positive
    IDK how Junie does it, but I spend less than $50 USD per month and I'm on it 30 hours per week.HN: SpaceX / Cursor thread · 22 Apr 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • mixed
    While Junie is nowhere near as good as Claude Code, it is way ahead of the current Google tooling.HN: Our eighth generation TPUs · 22 Apr 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • mixed
    but it burns thru credits leaving me topping up $5 every dayHN: Gemini 3.5 Flash · 20 May 2026 · news.ycombinator.com
  • negative
    I use Junie at work and I have to say I'm not amazed by it.HN: JetBrains Air · 22 Sept 2026 · news.ycombinator.com

Pricing

As published, checked 26 Sept 2026.

PlanPriceNotes
FreeFree5 AI credits included; BYOK at provider rates with zero markup; supports locally running models
AI Pro$8.33 / monthlyPer user; 10 AI credits per 30 days; anytime top-ups. Price shown is the annual-billing equivalent (buy link is the yearly SKU)
AI Ultimate$25 / monthlyPer user; 35 AI credits per 30 days; 'Recommended for Junie'; anytime top-ups. Annual-billing equivalent; an HN user reports $30 when paid monthly
Junie LocalFreeRuns entirely on an Apple Silicon Mac with a local model; no registration, subscription or credits

Recent changes

Ranked alongside

Other ranked entries in Coding agents.

Compare with the top two
OpenCodeAnomaly75
Claude CodeAnthropic73
Zed (Agent Panel)Zed Industries73
GitHub CopilotGitHub (Microsoft)72

Sources

Every figure above traces to one of these, observed up to 26 Sept 2026.

  1. GitHub API repo metadata (460 stars, license NOASSERTION; LICENSE.md: all rights reserved)
  2. JetBrains Marketplace plugin API: 33,688,984 downloads (not a methodology signal; recorded for context)
  3. npm: @jetbrains/junie-cli 198 downloads last week (secondary package, not used)
  4. SWE-rebench leaderboard (15/05/2026-01/07/2026 window): Junie rank 6 overall, 61.8% resolved, top of 4 listed agent harnesses; board does not meet the 10-harness minimum
  5. JetBrains AI Service Terms v2.1 (no training on inputs/outputs)
  6. The Register: JetBrains wants to train AI models on your code snippets (non-commercial default-on data sharing; Junie pricing complaints)
  7. IDEsaster research listing JetBrains Junie CVE-2025-58335
  8. JetBrains AI Assistant docs: Junie, .aiignore, Brave mode
  9. HN Algolia API, comments mentioning Junie since 2025-09-26 (118 hits; source of HN items)
  10. PullPush Reddit archive API (source of Reddit items)
  11. vibecoding.app Junie review (excluded from expertReviews: site discloses affiliate links)
  12. Terminal-Bench 2.0 snapshot: Junie CLI harnessRank 18 of 43, best 71.01% (Multiple models, 2026-03-07); no Junie entry in swe-bench.json